Thank you
Archive for October, 2014
  • The ProteGen Sling is a woven polyester sling-like Trans-Vaginal Mesh implant. Boston Scientific introduced the sling into the marketplace in 1997, as a treatment for feminine stress urinary incontinence – a condition that causes urine leakage while coughing, laughing, or undergoing physical activity. During the procedure, surgeons implant the “sling” underneath the bladder and anchor it to the pelvic bones. The mesh then provides support to the pelvic muscles, thereby reducing the “stress” that can cause urinary leakage. The term “ProteGen” refers to the fact that the slings were treated with bovine collagen.

    Problems with infection and mesh erosion began to arise shortly after the ProteGen Sling went into use. Boston Scientific reportedly received over 500 complaints about mesh injuries before it issued a ProteGen sling recall in December of 1999. Approximately 23,000 ProteGen Slings were distributed during the two years the product was on the market.

    Thousands of women have filed product liability lawsuits against Boston Scientific since the ProteGen Sling recalltook place. The federal cases were consolidated into multidistrict litigation in a federal court in Maryland. In 2003 alone, the company settled over 700 ProteGen lawsuits. As the occurrence of Protegen complications has continued, so has the filing of lawsuits. In addition, other Trans-Vaginal mesh products are currently the focus of mass product liability cases, including suits against Johnson & Johnson over its Gynecare Prolift sling.

    Getting Money Before Your Settlement

    The Transvaginal Mesh Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) has been the longest MDL in history. Patients across the world have been waiting years for their full settlement so they can get their life back on track. We became a financial bridge for those patients everywhere by supplying them with pre-settlement funding. The pre-settlement funding we offer is for patients to payoff their medical bills, costs of living, and whatever they need to get their life back on track. The best part about our funding is that it is non-recourse so if you somehow lose your case, you don’t have to pay back anything.

    We take the risk so you don’t have to.

  • Countless women have undergone Transvaginal Mesh procedures in order to correct complications caused by childbirth. During the procedure flexible surgical mesh is implanted through the vaginal wall in order to strengthen the pelvic muscles. Prolene mesh, a popular brand of surgical mesh, has been linked to a number of dangerous complications. As a result, thousands of women who received Prolene mesh implants have filed lawsuits to recover compensation for their injuries.

    Prolene mesh is a polypropylene (plastic) mesh implant used to support and stabilize the vaginal wall and pelvic floor. Ethicon, a division of Johnson & Johnson (J&J), created Prolene mesh primarily to treat two conditions that affect women: pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI). POP is a condition in which a woman’s pelvic muscles become weakened, causing pelvic organs to slip out of place. SUI, on the other hand, is uncontrollable urine leakage caused by strenuous activities such as working out, coughing, and laughing. Both POP and SUI are often caused by weakened pelvic muscles due to child birth.

    Many Prolene mesh patients have filed lawsuits against J&J to recover compensation for their medical costs, out of pocket expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering. Mesh injury lawsuits are commonly based on product liability law. Under product liability law, manufacturers and sellers have a duty to ensure that their products are free from any unexpected dangers or defects. Consumers who are injured by a defective product can sue the manufacturer for compensation.

    Getting Money Before Your Settlement

    The Transvaginal Mesh Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) has been the longest MDL in history. Patients across the world have been waiting years for their full settlement so they can get their life back on track. We became a financial bridge for those patients everywhere by supplying them with pre-settlement funding. The pre-settlement funding we offer is for patients to payoff their medical bills, costs of living, and whatever they need to get their life back on track. The best part about our funding is that it is non-recourse so if you somehow lose your case, you don’t have to pay back anything.

    We take the risk so you don’t have to.

  • TransVaginal Mesh is a surgical material used to treat women who suffer from pelvic organ prolapse or stress urinary incontinence. Avaulta, a popular brand of TransVaginal Mesh, has been linked to serious health problems. As a result, many patients have filed lawsuits over injuries related to the mesh. An Avaulta mesh recall may be on the horizon as well.

    Avaulta’s TransVaginal Mesh a Manufactured by Bard, the TransVaginal Mesh is a woven material that is inserted in the vaginal wall to reinforce the wall’s structure. The mesh is often used to treat patients suffering from pelvic organ prolapse (POP) or stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

    Pelvic organ prolapse is typically caused by damage and stretching of the tissues that keep the pelvic organs in place. POP is often seen in women who have had vaginal births. For patients with POP, the Avaulta mesh helps prevent the pelvic organs from moving out of place. For patients with SUI, on the other hand, the mesh helps support the pelvic muscles and prevent urine leakage caused by sneezing, exercising, coughing, and laughing.

    Although Bard has not issued an Avaulta mesh recall, the manufacturer has stopped selling its Avaulta Plus mesh products. Similarly, other manufacturers, such as Johnson & Johnson, have pulled their TransVaginal mesh products from the market. Bard discontinued Avaulta mesh after the product was linked to several serious health risks.

    The FDA found that the dangers associated with using TV mesh could outweigh the benefits of the product. Based on the reported side effects, the FDA also considered classifying TransVaginal Meshes as high-risk products. Bard is also facing multiple lawsuits for injuries related to Avaulta mesh.

    Getting Money Before Your Settlement

    The Transvaginal Mesh Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) has been the longest MDL in history. Patients across the world have been waiting years for their full settlement so they can get their life back on track. We became a financial bridge for those patients everywhere by supplying them with pre-settlement funding. The pre-settlement funding we offer is for patients to payoff their medical bills, costs of living, and whatever they need to get their life back on track. The best part about our funding is that it is non-recourse so if you somehow lose your case, you don’t have to pay back anything.

    We take the risk so you don’t have to.

  • The term “defective” has a very specific meaning within product liability law. Manufacturers and sellers of products have a duty to ensure that all products they introduce into the marketplace are as safe as possible. A product is considered by law to be “defective” if it’s determined to be unreasonably dangerous when used as intended. When the intended use of a product carries unavoidable risks of injury, the manufacturer must adequately warn customers about the risks.
    A product may be unreasonably dangerous because of its design, an error in the manufacturing process, or because its dangers were not adequately disclosed. As a result, a number of different factors can make TransVaginal mesh defective.
    Each TransVaginal Mesh product is entitled to an individual judgment as to whether it is “defective” within the meaning of product liability law. Still, thousands of product liability lawsuits have been filed against multiple TransVaginal Mesh manufacturers, and millions of dollars have been paid out in legal settlements. In 2003 alone, Boston Scientific settled over 700 ProteGen Sling lawsuits.

    Who is Liable for TransVaginal Mesh Injuries?

    One of the distinguishing characteristics of product liability law is that all actors involved in the chain of commerce may be held liable for injury-producing products even if they are faultless. This is called strict liability, and it makes product liability very unique among personal injury laws. For example, under a product liability theory asserted against a TransVaginal Mesh manufacturer, all that has to be shown to establish liability is that the product is defective in its design, manufacture, or marketing, and that the defect caused the plaintiff to sustain injury.
    Anyone woman who has sustained a TransVaginal Mesh injury and wants to explore her legal rights should consult with an attorney who is knowledgeable about TransVaginal Mesh injuries. An attorney can discuss the status of current litigation involving particular TransVaginal Mesh products, and can assess the overall strengths and weaknesses of her individual case. However, it is important to obtain legal advice as soon as possible because the law of each state limits the time in which a product liability lawsuit may be filed.

    Getting Money Before Your Settlement

    The Transvaginal Mesh Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) has been the longest MDL in history. Patients across the world have been waiting years for their full settlement so they can get their life back on track. We became a financial bridge for those patients everywhere by supplying them with pre-settlement funding. The pre-settlement funding we offer is for patients to payoff their medical bills, costs of living, and whatever they need to get their life back on track. The best part about our funding is that it is non-recourse so if you somehow lose your case, you don’t have to pay back anything.

    We take the risk so you don’t have to.

Free Case Review and Guidance

Get A Piece Of Your Mesh Settlement Before You Settle In Court

Contact Us Now